To what extent Chinese government’s political indoctrination and Chinese populace traumatized historical memories constitute a dialectical/reciprocal relation, to what extent they conflict? Custom Paper

[meteor_slideshow slideshow=”new”]

1. To what extent Chinese government’s political indoctrination and Chinese populace traumatized historical memories constitute a dialectical/reciprocal relation, to what extent they conflict? In another word, in what ways Chinese historical traumas such as Nanjing Massacre are chosen or given? What is the role of critical thinking in these government-populace interactions?
2. How the Patriotic education works in China after 1991 and why it has been successful even among Chinese youths who have never experienced a century of humiliation themselves? What are its downsides? To what extent this educational campaign is uniquely Chinese and international/global the same time?
3. Aside from victor and victim narratives prevalent in changing discourses in pre and post-patriotic education scenes in China, are there other narratives embedded? What are the ways that Chinese government smoothes out the tension between the victor and victim narratives?

[sliceshow id=”5316″]