The issues with the power and discretion that judges have Custom Paper

You will write two analytical paper assignments for this course.
You must clearly cite all sources and include an additional reference page.
The content of the paper should be at least 8 pages in length (not
including cover page and bibliography), 12 pt. font, and double spaced.
The papers should comply with APA citation.
Citation Requirements: You must use at least 6 citations for your final
paper, including 3 articles from relevant journals and two citations
from the textbook (Judicial Process & Judicial Policymaking, 5th
edition) or lecture notes (I can send these to you if you need them) to
support your argument. These should be properly cited with a separate
work cited page. You earn credit for required citations.
You must clearly cite all sources and include an additional reference page.
For both papers, you need to raise an effective thesis or research
question of your interest. I give you complete flexibility to create a
research question, but it must be within the realm of judicial policy
and social process or relate to the materials we covered in class
throughout the semester.
The first paper is a literature review on your specific research
question. In this paper, you must raise
your argument, thesis, or research question, and cite at least six
references to support your main point. The second paper is an extended
project built upon your first paper and a full version research project
on your research topic.
The first literature paper is worth 30 points and the second full paper
is worth70.
Your presentation is worth 40 points. Your analysis will allow me to
assess the development of your
comprehension and application of the course materials, while training
you to critically write about issues on judicial policy and social process.
Please include this information on cover page.
Title
By
Stacy Vernier
University of Texas at Tyler
CRIJ 5302 � Judicial Policy and Social Process/ spring 2013
Dr. Szhang
Date:?

My feelings on the paper:
Why do Supreme Court judges and judges in general have so much
discretion? Where do we draw the line? The topic I want to address is
the issues with trying juveniles as adults and what type of sentencing
they get, when in fact they are not adults.
Depending on the jurisdiction, where the crime took place and the judge
all are in most part what will determine much of what happens to you
regardless of your history. There is of course, the law and precedence,
so they say. Yes we all have history but just how bad is it? Many
juveniles are tried as adults on a first time, non violent offense
without ever being tried as a juvenile and sent to a juvenile prison.
Who makes the decision of whether to try a juvenile as an adult? What
gives them that right when in fact they are juveniles? Criminal Law
affects the rights and aspirations of minorities, the poor, and
juveniles. Power, Discretion, judges has it.
Some Cases:
There are some cases such as the Atkins case and the Stanford v.
Kentucky where judges decide two totally different outcomes relating to
the execution of juveniles. The 8th amendment never changed but the
decisions of the judges did. How is this?
Judges have too much discretion. We could look at Marbury v. Madison and
that should tell you something about the power and discretion judges have.
On the federal and state levels what determines a juvenile needs to be
the same for all. A juvenile in one state should be a juvenile in all
states. A law in one state should be the law for all states.
Judges can change statutes and make decisions based on the constitution,
laws, and there discretion, what they believe to be good.
Their opinion. If this was not the case then all of the decisions that
came about involving juvenile�s cases would come out basically the same.
I guess what I am trying to point out is I feel that I feel that judges
have too much discretion and power. I would like to try and use
juveniles and cases, to confirm that judges do have too much discretion
and power. You can use other things too.
I write a lot relating to juveniles and my professors are very aware
that is where my passion lies.