The defense of consent protects a defendant from liability where a person voluntarily relinquishes the right to be free from harmful or offensive contact or imminent apprehension of such contact Custom Paper

The defense of consent protects a defendant from liability where a person voluntarily relinquishes the right to be free from harmful or offensive contact or imminent apprehension of such contact. Justify whether or not the following situation validly gives rise to the defense of consent.
Three friends were hanging out at the beach when one of the friends, Tom, said, “You couldn’t throw me into the water if you tried.” The other two friends jumped up, grabbed Tom, and threw him into the water, despite his protests and struggle. Upon hitting the water, Tom hit his head on a rock, leaving him partially paralyzed. Would Tom’s words give rise to the defense of consent given the context in which they were given?
Courts have held that an actor with a legal interest in land has the right to use reasonable force to prevent intrusions onto the land. Review the case (page 67) of Woodard vs. Turnipseed and discuss how the force justified by the concerns of the defendant, John Turnipseed, namely that Woodard may vandalize the time clock and the implicit threat in Woodard’s statement of “I will get you for this,” compares to the force used.

please answer each question separately

Negligence" Please respond to the following:

Proof that a person acted in an emergency could be given several different effects in a negligence case. It could absolve the person of liability, it could entitle the person to be judged with a standard of care that is less demanding than a typical standard of care, or it could be treated as just one factor among many that a jury considers in applying the reasonable person test. Justify the level of consideration that you believe that a person acted in an emergency should be given in determining whether or not a person is guilty of negligence.
Determine whether the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur should be applied in the following circumstance. Why or why not?
A store customer sat down in a chair provided by the store, and the chair collapsed, throwing the customer to the floor and causing injuries.